aside from what others have mentioned, one other comment the new suggested format for calling super is
self = [super init]; if (self) { etc... On Jun 21, 2010, at 10:43 AM, Eiko Bleicher wrote: > One of my initializers can fail and thus it should return nil. Consider the > following example: > > -(id) initWithBool:(BOOL)ok > { > if (self = [super init]) > { > if (!ok) { > return nil; // Point of interest > } > } > return self; > } > > Does this code leak? I am inclined to think I need to call [self release] > before returning nil, but I am yet to see a piece of example code for this. > Or is my approach stupid? :-) > > Running in no-GC environment here. > > Thanks, > Eiko > > _______________________________________________ > > Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) > > Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. > Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com > > Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: > http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/scott%40cocoadoc.com > > This email sent to sc...@cocoadoc.com _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com