Yes, I should have included my own program as it all has to work together. Still, it makes the "Optional" switch rather useless, if you ask me. Perhaps there is a way to introduce some synchronization that I'm not aware of.
On Sat, Nov 13, 2010 at 3:34 PM, Jerry Krinock <je...@ieee.org> wrote: > > On 2010 Nov 13, at 13:24, Paul Johnson wrote: > > > So, what I understand is that there are some "race conditions" within > Core Data that make it impossible to specify that a property be required and > that it is necessary to include in one's code any checks for the presence of > values. > > No; the race conditions are in the interaction between the business logic, > bindings, etc. in your design and Core Data. > > _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
