I agree that the idea is to skip the Time Machine directory (current or old), not the entire partition.
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 8:51 PM, Charles Srstka <cocoa...@charlessoft.com> wrote: > On Aug 2, 2011, at 12:37 PM, Stephane Sudre wrote: > > Worse case: an old time machine partition has been replaced by a new > one. Since the old partition is some kind of a second backup, the user > has not removed the Time Machine files. [...] > Typical scenario: Encountering a Time Machine drive causes a nice and quick > recursive search through not many files, since most users don’t store too > many extra files on their Time Machine backup drive. > In either case, you *will* find the file you need, regardless of whether or > not there happens to be a Backups.backupdb there. _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
