> Define "doesn't work" - if you mean observeValue:forKeyPath:... doesn't get > called,
Indeed that's what I meant. > it's because that's a different relationship from bindings. Just assumptions (I know) but I would think the default implementation does something similar to the code shown in the docs ...which is why I expected that behavior. Not to mention the people on the cited post saying "it's not needed" without explaining what needs tot be changed. > With bindings, a change in one value causes a change in another. With > observers, a change in one value causes a call to the observeValue method. I am not following here - could you elaborate? Are you saying with normal bindings there is just no observing involved? cheers, Torsten _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: http://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
