On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 18:56:32 -0800, Jerry Krinock said: >> I take it you are using your technique successfully in practice? > >Maybe not. I'd pasted in some of my code but modified it for your >case. Although I have done a lot of stuff in that method, I'm not sure >if I have ever used that specific technique of *not* invoking super, to >"delete" an object.
OK, well, it seems to be working well at least! >If you invoked associateSourceInstanc >e:withDestinationInstance:forEntityMapping: per the documentation, you'd >pass nil for destinationInstance. And then it will either (1) >degenerate internally to a no-op, (2) raise an exception, or (3) crash. >You can figure it out from there :) As I said in my previous post, it goes boom. :( I'll just not invoke super, it seems the right stuff is happening... Thanks! -- ____________________________________________________________ Sean McBride, B. Eng s...@rogue-research.com Rogue Research www.rogue-research.com Mac Software Developer Montréal, Québec, Canada _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
