On Mar 13, 2013, at 2:13 AM, Jean-Daniel Dupas <devli...@shadowlab.org> wrote:
> Le 13 mars 2013 à 01:55, Wim Lewis <w...@omnigroup.com> a écrit :
>> On 12 Mar 2013, at 2:08 AM, Graham Cox wrote:
>>> in a + method, [self class] === self. Once you've got that, you've got it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>> 
>>> You're overthinking this.
>>> 
>>> A class method is just an instance method of the class object. No magic at 
>>> all. So all this confusion you've caused yourself about [super class] and 
>>> so on is wholly unnecessary to correctly use class methods.
>> 
>> To be very slightly pedantic, the only magic here is 'super' --- sending a 
>> message to super (which you can only do from a method implementation) is 
>> special syntax that searches for the method starting with the 
>> implementation's class's superclass, rather than at the receiver's actual 
>> class. Everything else is non-magic. (In general, that's been one of the 
>> strengths of ObjC: very little magic.)
>> 
> 
> To be ever more pedantic, there is other magic involved when sending a 
> message to a class.
> If there is no class method that matches the selector, the runtime will then 
> search for instance methods of the root class.

Note that this isn't "magic" really;  it's a quirk of the type system (both 
formal and dynamic).  The root metaclass is a subclass of the root class.

This can be problematic if you really want your root class to have a layout 
that's bigger than just an isa field, because the ABI and runtime just hardcode 
the layout of classes and there is no room for extra fields there — thus you 
need to be sure that anything using your extra fields is never invoked on a 
class object.

John.
_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to