On 02 Sep 2013, at 18:42, Graham Cox <graham....@bigpond.com> wrote: > Maybe more education is needed but we thought we had explained all that. > Maybe we need to display the calculated pixel sizes up front so the user > doesn't get surprised by the outcome.
I’d go with the latter. If a popular app or the system display stuff in one format, display it the same way. If you need to display this way, maybe go with: 16 bit 256 x 256 (128 x 128 @ 144dpi) or something like that, so users can get the information needed, but also know which value Finder gets its info from. IMO pixels are actually a good idea, because for bitmaps it indicates whether it has enough pixels to print (even if you may have to resize it a little) Whereas that’s harder to tell. I.e. if I know my paper is 5 inches wide and my printer is 300 dpi. I can tell that anything below 1500px width will look blocky at full width. Or for the web, you know what size it can be at most, stuff like that. Cheers, -- Uli Kusterer “The Witnesses of TeachText are everywhere...” http://zathras.de _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com