On 21 Oct 2013, at 06:01, Seth Willits <sli...@araelium.com> wrote: > On Oct 19, 2013, at 9:27 AM, Jerry Krinock wrote: > >> That's interesting and I've never seen it done. >> >> I'd call it a variation of writing custom accessors for each attribute. >> Custom accessors for each attribute have the advantage of reliably catching >> all model changes, not just those driven by Cocoa Bindings. But your >> technique is way less code, by a factor of the number of attributes, and >> requires zero maintenance. > > I've done it / do it in one particular project in one spot out of notable > convenience. It works, but only for modifications using KVC, and I do recall > having at least one bug where a modification wasn't using KVC and wasn't > triggering the code I was expecting it to. > Yes. You need to keep your wits about you with this sort of thing.
> I gag a little whenever I remember that's how it works, but at this point it > ain't broke so I'm not going to tempt fate by fixing it. ;-) > What would you suggest as a possible fix? Jonathan _______________________________________________ Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com) Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list. Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription: https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com
