When you use —deep, "all signing options you specify [on the app bundle] will 
apply, in turn, to such nested content [as embedded frameworks, helpers, 
resources, etc]” which is not the correct thing that should happen.

https://devforums.apple.com/thread/203126?start=0&tstart=0


--
Seth Willits



On Nov 5, 2013, at 3:39 AM, Jakob Egger <ja...@eggerapps.at> wrote:

> Does anybody know why just specifying "--deep" in "Other Code Signing Flags" 
> is wrong? Is it only a problem with Sparkle, or is there a general problem?
> 
> In my app I just specified --deep and it seems to work!
> 
> On 29 Oct 2013, at 10:37 pm, Shazron <shaz...@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
>> See http://furbo.org/2013/10/17/code-signing-and-mavericks/ he specifically
>> deals with your Sparkle.framework problem
>> 
>> 
>> On Tue, Oct 29, 2013 at 5:30 PM, Graham Cox <graham....@bigpond.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> Having just updated to Xcode 5.0.1, I can’t build one of our apps because
>>> it uses the Sparkle framework, which isn’t codesigned. Previously this
>>> wasn’t an issue but it seems Xcode is being a bit stricter than before.
>>> 
>>> Is there a way I can codesign this module using my own credentials? I have
>>> little experience of dealing with these issues, most of the time I just
>>> hope it works and it does, but now it doesn’t I’m in a very tight spot.  -
>>> I can’t easily downgrade to the older Xcode and I need this app built by
>>> tomorrow!



--
Seth Willits




_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to