Iain,

I forgot to say that this was the first thing I checked when the apps were 
first rejected. I moved from the automatic provisioning profile to explicit 
ones, but still the apps were rejected. Maybe I still got the provisioning 
profiles wrong. I’ll double check.

Thanks!

Martin



> On 29 Oct 2014, at 08:35, iain <i...@falsevictories.com> wrote:
> 
> I had the same issue: it turned out that Xcode's automatic provisioning 
> profile choice was not as smart as I'd hoped and had picked a provisioning 
> profile that had a maps entitlement. Setting the correct profile fixed it. 
> 
> I'd check there first before a DTS
> 
> Iain
> 
> 
> 
>> On 29 Oct 2014, at 7:01 am, Martin Hewitson <martin.hewit...@aei.mpg.de> 
>> wrote:
>> 
>> Dear list,
>> 
>> I recently submitted updates to three different apps on the app store. All 
>> three were rejected due to:
>> 
>> "This app uses one or more entitlements which do not have matching 
>> functionality within the app. Apps should have only the minimum set of 
>> entitlements necessary for the app to function properly. Please remove all 
>> entitlements that are not needed by your app and submit an updated binary 
>> for review, including the following:
>> 
>> com.apple.developer.maps
>> “
>> 
>> None of these apps uses the maps entitlement. I’ve checked in Xcode that the 
>> entitlements file doesn’t contain this, and that under Capabilities the Maps 
>> switch is off. The resolution centre is suggesting that I use a DTS ticket 
>> to resolve this, but before I do, has anyone else had the same problem and 
>> found a solution?
>> 
>> All submissions were made using Xcode Version 6.1 (6A1046a).
>> 
>> Many thanks,
>> 
>> Martin


_______________________________________________

Cocoa-dev mailing list (Cocoa-dev@lists.apple.com)

Please do not post admin requests or moderator comments to the list.
Contact the moderators at cocoa-dev-admins(at)lists.apple.com

Help/Unsubscribe/Update your Subscription:
https://lists.apple.com/mailman/options/cocoa-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com

This email sent to arch...@mail-archive.com

Reply via email to