On Sun, 22 Jul 2001, Torsten Curdt wrote:
> > Torsten Curdt a écrit :
> > >
> > > Are there reasons or objections not to change
> > > the access to the contenthandler in the xsp.xsl
> > > from "this.contentHandler" to only "contentHandler"?
> > >
> > > Then we could do a local redirect of SAX events:
> > >
> > > ...
> > > contentHandler.startElement("", "item", "item", xspAttr);
> > > {
> > > AttributesImpl xspAttr = new AttributesImpl();
> > > XMLConsumer contentHandler = ...;
> > >
> > > contentHandler.startElement("", "item", "item", xspAttr);
> > > }
> > >
> > > It gives us the feature of redirecting SAX events
> > > to other XMLConsumers. (This would be a real seamless
> > > integration for the XForm and DOMObject implementation)
> > >
> > > There should be no undesired side effects...
> >
> > Yes, there are side effects with logicsheets that use
> > this.contentHandler.
>
> Then we make them not to use it, too ;)
>
> > I use the following construct to change the contentHandler :
> > <xsp:logic>
> > ContentHandler oldHandler = this.contentHandler;
> > try {
> > this.contentHandler = otherHandler;
> > ...
> > } finally {
> > this.contentHandler = oldHandler;
> > }
> > </xsp:logic>
>
> ...I was just not sure if changing the contentHandler in
> a multi thread environment is a good idea...
Don't worry. Generators are pooled so that one instance is dedicated to
one thread at a single point in time.
Giacomo
>
> ..but if this is really ok - I'm also fine with that!
> (Although a simple search and replace over logicsheets
> should be a bit cleaner - don't you think?)
>
> regards
> --
> Torsten
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
