Gianugo,
As i answered earlier, you can inject a transformer in between that will resolver the
relative
URL's and pump in the absolute url's just before your serializer is called. Will this
work?
Please don't treat my answer as absolute. Let us get others opinion as well. Also see
previous
email discussion on the subject:
http://mailman.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2001-May/007246.html
http://mailman.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2001-May/007246.html
Thanks,
dims
--- Gianugo Rabellino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dims,
>
> thanks for your reply. I'm quite surprised of this approach
> and would really appreciate to get a grasp on the reason
> for doing this (since I'm sure there must be a good one :)).
>
> I'm still a bit confused and hope there is a way to get
> around this issue: actually my problem is to resolve relative
> URL in document streams (which is not an issue for HTML where
> URLs are resolved by a browser but it's a serious limitations
> for serializers based on XSL:FO, since they need to embed
> the resource right into the stream). AFAIK this is not possible
> even with the current FOPSerializer, which doesn't work - at
> least on my setup - with relative URLs and this can be quite
> an issue for applications that need to generate formats other
> than HTML. Should I assume that the official Cocoon answer is
> "keep your links absolute"?
>
> Thanks again,
>
> --
> Gianugo Rabellino
>
>
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 05:11:42AM -0700, Davanum Srinivas wrote:
> > Gianugo,
> >
> > Yes. This is on purpose. If you are really keen on it, then you can add a new
>transformer that
> can
> > modify the sax stream as needed, followed by one of the regular serializers like
>XML or HTML
> > serializer.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > dims
> >
> > --- Gianugo Rabellino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I'm a bit confused about the serialization API in Cocoon 2. I'm writing a
> > > serializer and I need access to some informations normally available in
> > > generators/transformers via the Map passed in the setup() method. I see that
> > > serializers do not have this approach, all they need is to set the
> > > OutputStream to write to. Is that on purpose or am I missing something? Is
> > > there a way to retrieve the information I need?
> > >
> > > TIA,
> > >
> > > --
> > > Gianugo Rabellino
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> >
> >
> > =====
> > Davanum Srinivas, JNI-FAQ Manager
> > http://www.jGuru.com/faq/JNI
> >
> > __________________________________________________
> > Do You Yahoo!?
> > Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
> > http://im.yahoo.com
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
>
> --
> Gianugo Rabellino Via Comune Antico, 43
> C.T.O. 20125 Milano (MI) - Italy
> Bibop Research, Int. S.p.A. [EMAIL PROTECTED] - http://www.bibop.it
>
> "No fim tudo acaba bem. Se ainda nao esta bem, e' porque ainda
> nao chegou ao fim" - Fernando Sabino
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
=====
Davanum Srinivas, JNI-FAQ Manager
http://www.jGuru.com/faq/JNI
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Get email alerts & NEW webcam video instant messaging with Yahoo! Messenger
http://im.yahoo.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
