Marcus Crafter wrote:
>
> On Wed, Dec 12, 2001 at 03:14:26PM +0100, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>
> > > I'm quite keen to learn of a better way to
> > > ascertain this information and I'm open if you have any suggestions
> > > about how to improve it ?
> >
> > The code seems to be collecting the maximum number of incoming
> > concurrent requests. It might be useful, I don't know, but for sure it
> > doesn't require synchronization. I mean: adding and subtracting one to a
> > counter is an atomic operation (on ints, it's not on longs, but we don't
> > have that many requests anyway).
> >
> > The non-atomic operation is the comparison with previous maximum. One
> > possible simple solution is to have a sampling thread that reads that
> > value and logs it someplace. It might be useful for profiling
> > information.
> >
> > What do you think?
>
> Ok. Sounds good to me.
cool.
> I'll come up with a diff over the weekend.
Even better.
> Thanks for your suggestions. Please feel free to offer further critique
> in the future, it's much appreciated.
Oh, don't worry about that :)
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
