Marcus Crafter wrote: > > Hi Carsten, > > On Wed, Dec 19, 2001 at 04:29:50PM +0100, Carsten Ziegeler wrote: > > > Now, if we stick to a simple rule, we could easily have all > exceptions in > > the log and these only once which would make reading the log > files a little > > bit easier. So, there are two alternatives: > > a) always log an exception when it's raised but not when it's catched > > b) always log an exception when it's catched but not when it's raised > > > > I'm +1 on b). > > > > Opinions? > > I agree with you mate, b). Also, in several places exceptions are > caught, logged and then rethrown (and potentially re-logged > elsewhere), which b) could cover too if we wanted (eg. only log > at the most highest handler). > Yes, especially these place should be changed.
Cheers, Carsten > Cheers, > > Marcus > > -- > ..... > ,,$$$$$$$$$, Marcus Crafter > ;$' '$$$$: Computer Systems Engineer > $: $$$$: ManageSoft GmbH > $ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse > ;$, _/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany > ' /( &&& > \_&&&&' Email : [EMAIL PROTECTED] > &&&&. Business Hours : +49 69 9757 200 > &&&&&&&: > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
