Roger I Martin PhD wrote:
> Hello Berin,
>
> I went a little further and got more of an education of the workings of
> avalon and cocoon (the greatness of open source :)). Got the latest cvs of
> avalon and cocoon2 compiling and working with mysql databases using
> tomcat-4.0.2-b1 and jdk1.4-beta3!
>
> In the JdbcConnectionPool I changed JdbcConnection to AbstractJdbcConnection
> and in JdbcConnectionFactory changed JdbcConnection to Jdbc3Connection and
> the constructors were gotten. This of course won't work with jdk1.3.x.
>
> Starting at line 105 in JdbcConnectionFactory:
>
> if ( null != this.m_connectionClass )
> {
> try
> {
> Class clazz =
> Thread.currentThread().getContextClassLoader().loadClass(
> this.m_connectionClass );
> Class[] paramTypes = new Class[] { Connection.class,
> String.class };
> Object[] params = new Object[] { connection,
> this.m_keepAlive };
>
> Constructor constructor = clazz.getConstructor(
> paramTypes );
> System.out.println(this.m_connectionClass);
> jdbcConnection = (Jdbc3Connection)
> constructor.newInstance( params );
> System.out.println("first try");
> }
> catch ( Exception e )
> {
> ...
> "first try" ouput occurs when run.
>
> Question: Do you want to make Jdbc3Connection a subclass of JdbcConnection
> or use the AbtractJdbcConnection throughout the code?
I would prefer to use AbstractJdbcConnection, as there are some folks who
have to create their own JdbcConnection objects for various reasons (mainly
to work around idiosychrasies in code).
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
