Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
>
> On Wednesday 06 February 2002 12:56, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> >. . .
> > <transform src="[news]:[rss]->[document].[xslt]/no-abstract"/>
> > <transform src="[structure]:[layout]->[document].[xslt]"/>
> > <transform src="[skin]:[document]->[fo].[xslt]/A4/with-index"/>
>
> This looks ugly (or is it just me?) which is usually not a good sign ;-)
>
> >. . .
> > The same functionality can be done eliminating this further address
> > space by taking the internal component file space and mapping it
> > one2one with the contract:
> >
> > <transform src="[news]://adaptors/rss2document/no-abstract.xslt"/>
> > <transform src="[structure]://adaptors/layout2document.xslt"/>
> > <transform
> > src="[skin]://stylesheets/document2fo/A4/with-index.xsl"/>
> >. . .
>
> Yes, I agree here - not enforcing all contracts at the [virtual
> protocol] level, but having additional subcontracts more loosely
> defined at a second level, did I get it right?
>
> Looks at lot like polymorphism to me: considering no-abstract.xslt as
> an object of its "superclass" [news:]//adaptors/rss2document without
> caring about the details.
Exactly!!!
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
