Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
> Berin Loritsch wrote:
>
>
>>The question remains about the ECM itself yet. I haven't had time to write
>>the profiling tests yet.
>>
>
> I fully trust your judgement on this.
:)
I found out that the ECM implementation has been changed, and the hashmaps backing
the ECM are now Container.synchronizedMap() wrapped. :(
When I took off the synchronization, the time spent for 50,000 requests with 20
concurrent threads went from ~80,000ms to ~9,000ms. However this is not a
threadsafe solution--I will add back in the external locking mechanism (the
ReadWriteLock)
and make this work safely and a bit better.
--
"They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety
deserve neither liberty nor safety."
- Benjamin Franklin
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
