At 1:52 am +0100 7/3/02, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>
>> I was about to commit the POI stuff, but then I felt a bit uneasy with how
>> the current build is organized.
<snip/>
>I don't like the markup semantics but I see your point and I like the
>concept.
>
>> 2. make all samples to be mounted in a "samples" dir, each with its
>> subsitemap. This could make it easy to not put them in when there are
>> optional components not presents, or also use Cocoon easily without the
>> samples.
>
>I like this so far.
>
>> 3. Structure the build as in Centipede or Forrest by using external
>> entities, by dividing the build targets in many .xpart files. Forrest has an
>> example of this in CVS.
>
>I don't like this, we should stay away from entities as much as
>possible.[also true for forrest, I'd love that to be changed]
>
>What do others think about this?
Regardless of the particular issue of reorganisation proposed by Nicola Ken
Barozzi and Stefano's response, which I agree with ..... I think the
samples in the main sitemap would definitely be improved by being seperated
into several sub-sitemaps. The main sitemap is far too complicated, it
makes Cocoon look more complicated than it really is to use!
regards Jeremy
--
___________________________________________________________________
Jeremy Quinn Karma Divers
webSpace Design
HyperMedia Research Centre
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.media.demon.co.uk>
<phone:+44.[0].20.7737.6831> <pager:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
