giacomo wrote:
> In fact I don't think we can change the Selector interface as it is
> clearly stated what a Selector is and how it works (read: not a pipeline
> component). It doesn't mess with the SAX event in a pipeline (also for
> backwards compatability).
Yes, that's a good point, but the semantics looks so similar that might
be misleading... hmmm, I still don't know if this is a good idea or not.
> Maybe there needs to be other sematic in the sitemap to achieve what was
> requested (honestly I have not had the need for such things so I don't
> really care)
Yes, I see three solutions:
1) ignore the proposal (but we must find a way to implement the same
functionality without hacks!)
2) change the Selector interface
3) add another pipeline-aware routing sitemap component
Tough decision indeed!
--
Stefano Mazzocchi One must still have chaos in oneself to be
able to give birth to a dancing star.
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Friedrich Nietzsche
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
