At 1:42 pm +0100 15/3/02, Stefano Mazzocchi wrote:
>Jeremy Quinn wrote:
>
>> Does your Blocks scheme go as far as making components like XIndice, SQL,
>> POI, FOP, LDAP etc. as Blocks, shared by other Blocks that are more
>> application specific?
>
>Yes, exactly.
cool
>> One comment:
>>
>> I would like to see the ability for a block to have a URL base or context
>> for it's content to be different to it's actual location, the same way you
>> can overlay the context of two sub-sitemaps like <slash-edit/> does, or be
>> able to keep actual content separate from associated classes etc., because
>> maybe it is to be modified by site users, etc.
>
>Ok, do you think the proposed solution mets your needs?
I thought afterwards that this was a bit of a dumb question, there exists
SiteMap syntax for handling this, and Block have SiteMaps, right?
thanks
regards Jeremy
--
___________________________________________________________________
Jeremy Quinn Karma Divers
webSpace Design
HyperMedia Research Centre
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.media.demon.co.uk>
<phone:+44.[0].20.7737.6831> <pager:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
