At 2:18 pm +0100 27/3/02, Sylvain Wallez wrote:
>Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 27 Mar 2002, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>>
>>>TreeProcessor will be the default engine in the next release.
>>>I would like to see it set as default starting right away.
>>>
>>>What do you guys think?
>>>
>>
>>...there are still some issues...
>>
>Which ones ? Jeremy found a bug in view handling a few hours after 2.0.2
>went out, but it's now fixed.
>
>There are still some ongoing discussions about views, but it's not
>treeprocessor-specific and it behaves just like the compiled engine.
>
>>as soon as everything is fixed +1
>>
>Well, from my POV, +1 ;)
>
>Sylvain
Sorry, there was still the little issue of this working in Compiled, but
not Interpreted:
<map:aggregate element="root">
<map:part type="request"
element="req"/>
<map:part src="docs{target}"
element="original"/>
</map:aggregate>
TreeProcessor complains about the missing src parameter.
regards Jeremy
--
___________________________________________________________________
Jeremy Quinn Karma Divers
webSpace Design
HyperMedia Research Centre
<mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <http://www.media.demon.co.uk>
<phone:+44.[0].20.7737.6831> <pager:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
