On Fri, 5 Apr 2002 21:03:25 -0600, "Ivelin Ivanov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I dare to challange our sitemap gurus to make a comparative analisys of the > Jakarta Workflow engine and C2 sitemap. > > http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/workflow/ Workflow's approach appears to be based on a finite state machine model. Checkout the sample control file at: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/jakarta-commons-sandbox/workflow/src/wizard-demo/WEB-INF/wizard.xml?rev=1.1&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup The same approach can be modeled in Cocoon today using actions. However a much better approach is the one based on continuations. Check out the Schecoon calculator sample at: http://cvs.apache.org/viewcvs/xml-cocoon2/src/scratchpad/schecoon/webapp/examples/calc/calc.js?rev=1.3&content-type=text/vnd.viewcvs-markup and look at the additional resources used by it. It is my opinion that this model provides a much better way of describing the flow in Web applications and perhaps in Web services as well. Regards, Ovidiu --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
