Gianugo Rabellino wrote:
> Torsten Curdt wrote:
>> I always thought this would be a good thing. Have you implemented it
>> for the compiled sitemap, for the treeprocessor or for both?
>
>
> Alas, I was too short on time to catch up both with TreeProcessor anc
> compiled sitemap, so as of now this is available only on TreeProcessor.
> I might do my best to reconcile this change and port it to the compiled
> sitemap too, but I don't expect this to be an easy task. Besides, I
> think this is about time to discuss about this issue and put some rules.
> I see these possible choices:
>
> 1. choose one implementation (be it treeprocessor or compiled) and stick
> to it;
> 2. keep both, and let developers work with the one they prefer (with
> possible out of synch changes);
> 3. keep both, but refuse to release components that work only with one
> sitemap engine.
Personally, I'd let the compiled sitemap take the road of the T.Rex
(i.e. extinction). Here I am suggesting that we apply Stefano's model of
Software Darwinism: addition of "Expires" headers is a beneficial
mutation and the strain that adopts it is probably the one that is going
to survive.
Ugo (only slightly joking ;-) )
--
Ugo Cei - http://www.beeblogging.com/blog/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
