From: "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
> > From: "J.Pietschmann" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > I think I wrote that comment more than a year ago :-|
> > ... it's time I take a deeper look into it.
> > It should throw a RNF exception, not get there...
> >
> > Anyway, the senderror part is wrong as you pointed out :-/
>
> A quick recommendation on how to fix (rather hack) it?
> Omitting building the notification and simply return after
> the sendError()?
yes, I just checked the code; just do the senderror and return for now.
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
