From: "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> > I still prefer this uri syntax:
> >
> > {foo} (default sitemap module )
> > {pathto/foo} (default sitemap module with path)
> > {module:request://pathto/foo} (complete parameter uri)
> > or
> > {parameter://request.module/pathto/foo} (complete parameter
uri)
>
> Yes, that's complete, but I question it's effectiveness: all my FS
> alarms went on after reading this :/
;-)
Ok, so it would be like this?
sitemap params: param or sitemap:param
from a module (example): request:param
pathed sitemap params: ../../1
Hmmm...
I'm puzzeled over the pathed param, and using a URI was the most obvious and
consistent way I could find... but URI schemes can be made in different
ways...
How should handle (generally skeaking, not only 'bout naming) pathed params?
:-?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
