On Thursday, July 11, 2002, at 06:35 AM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> So, we need do to the following: > > a) Testing if everything works, espcially with regards to the different > JVMs - I did a quick SQL test with both versions and they both > worked. > > b) Update the documentation to include the "jvm-target" property etc. > This > should also go into the README > > c) Layout the distribution d) Check your docs for any 2.1-specific references and flag them (with <note> or similar). I may not get through each and every doc, so if you know the docs you have contributed have 2.1-specific content (either the doc as a whole or specific content within), please flag them as such. A while back, we decided on this list to sync HEAD and release docs to make it easier on committers working on docs. This included the provision that all 2.1-oriented docs would be noted to readers. I have added this info to a number of docs already, but I haven't concluded my general inventory of *all* docs. Any help would be greatly appreciated. I realize this is a bit of a manual hack, and I look forward to Forrest transition (coming soon) and solving this more elegantly, but I think the priority ATM should be user-friendly docs, however we achieve it. FYI, the only docs not synced remain changes.xml, todo.xml, sitemap.xmap, installing/index.xml, and installing/jars.xml. > Ah, and finally a release date. If no problems or big bugs are found, I > would propose monday, 15th of July. +1. Also, Carsten, let's include some language with the release notice about all the new docs accompanying it. We have *lots* of new content since 2.0.2. I'll provide a count if that helps! FYI: I'll update the live site for docs on Sunday if that works with this schedule. Diana --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
