Andrew,
do you mind terribly showing an example of an ESQL feeded by a dynamic query produced
by XSLT ?
Best regards,
---------------------------------------------
Luca Morandini
GIS Consultant
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://utenti.tripod.it/lmorandini/index.html
---------------------------------------------
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Andrew C. Oliver [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Saturday, July 13, 2002 3:17 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: [PROPOSAL] Remove SQLTransformer in 2.1
>
>
> Torsten Curdt wrote:
>
> >>P.S.
> >>I use SQLTransformer only, and I'm happy with it :) don't deprecate it :(
> >>
> >>
> >
> >I guess it would be cool for both ESQL and the SQLTransformer to share code as
> >well as syntax. But this will probably break backwards compatibility for
> >both. IMHO it could be nice to start a new combo of XSQL logicsheet and
> >XSQLTransformer from scratch.
> >
> >
> Off the top of my head this sounds good.
>
> >We could then deprecate ESQL and SQLTransformer and only apply bugfixes. So
> >it's up to them to upgrade to the new combo syntax or keep the old stuff.
> >
> >How about that?
> >
> Sounds good to me. But I would ask that there be a period of
> deprecation after which the old components move
> out of the main build. Let those who want to use Cocoon 2.3 with 2.0
> components do so at their own peril. Kind of
> an EOL (end of life) mode. Otherwise to paraphrase Stefano, you hasten
> the cold death of the Cocoon universe.
>
> -Andy
>
> >--
> >Torsten
> >
> >---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
