Theodore W. Leung wrote:
> This sounds very much like a subproject to me. Can you explain why you
> think this isn't just a subproject?
- It depends very strongly on Cocoon.
- The code it starts with will, have parts come out of Cocoon.
- We would want the Cocoon committers have automatic karma to it.
- Other subprojects already have a similar this arrangement, albeit on
the sister project Jakarta, like Lucene, Avalon, Turbine.
- It doesn't have a project goal, but is more a repository of Cocoon
apps, a sort of Cocoon-Commons.
On the other hand it would seem to be another subproject, since there
would be a different community round it, but this has also happened with
the cocoon-docs mailing list without creating a Cocoon-docs subproject.
Besides we would probably still want to use the Cocoon-dev and
Cocoon-user lists for it, at least in the early stages.
Basically we are thinking about a Cocoon subproject, versus the fact
that the norm is to have Xml.Apache Sub-Projects.
Can it be arranged?
> On Thu, 2002-08-08 at 07:09, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
>>Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>>
>>>Ok, can someone of the PMC clarify this.
>>>
>>>We should not use the cocoon cvs for cocoon-apps, so a
>>>separate cvs is the way to go. I don't want to give all
>>>'cocoon-apps' committers also access to cocoon itself.
>>>So it must be separated.
>>
>>Dear PMC, we need your assistance.
>>
>>Cocoon is gaining more "sample" applications every day, and more are
>>being proposed.
>>
>>We are in the process of cleaning the repository by separating the core,
>>the implementation and the components in different directories.
>>We also need to remove those apps that are not part of Cocoon itself but
>>that are important to us and to the community.
>>Therefore, a consensus is forming towards the creation of a new CVS
>>module for cocoon-apps.
>>
>>The reason why I contact you is that this would not be a completely
>>separate project itself, since we want the Cocoon committers to be able
>>to commit, while having the possibility of voting in committers that do
>>not commit to Cocoon.
>>A kind of young-sister project.
>>
>>Now, this is not a subproject, but not really still Cocoon.
>>What is it? How can it be arranged?
>>Lucene has a similar arrangement IIUC...
>>
>>Also, we had the proposal of a Forrest committer, Steven Noels, who is
>>driving the effort, and hasalready made available equipement.
>>He proposes to host this effort with his company's equipement.
>>Does Apache think it's possible to host Apache stuff on another server?
>>
>>Thank you in advance.
>>
>>
>>--
>>Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> - verba volant, scripta manent -
>> (discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
>>---------------------------------------------------------------------
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
