Christian Haul wrote:
> On 14.Aug.2002 -- 04:28 PM, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
>
>>Hi Team,
>>
>>we recently had our thread about Cocoon organization etc. and
>>it's now time to recapitulate the results.
>>
>>One main result is to split the core from optional things that
>>we from now on call modules (and not blocks!).
>
>
> Objection! We have "modules" already. This is going to cause
> confusion.
And CVS modules? ;-)
> After looking in my Oxford Thesaurus, the following alternatives might
> be suitable:
>
> portion
> element
> ingredient
> unit
> bit
> fragment
> piece
> item
> particle
>
> I like "particle" and "ingredient" best :-)
>
> "Oh, you need to include the XMLForm ingredient for that..."
I think that they simply are Cocoon "component"s, no?
--
Nicola Ken Barozzi [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- verba volant, scripta manent -
(discussions get forgotten, just code remains)
---------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
