Hi there, have tried to research the mail-archives, the documentation and the FAQ, but have not come up with a solution to a BSF-related problem, so my request for help in this group of very ;) knowledgable people. Here's the problem:
Extending the functionality of XSLT by defining a Rexx function which should get called with the help of BSF during an XSLT-transformation. Obviously the call()-Method is invoked and not apply(), which would supply the source-code in the form of a String. The BSF RexxEnigne call() method receives the declared function-name and the argument(s), but not the source code. Here's the question: how is it possible at runtime to get a hold of the source code (this is needed to be passed on to the used Rexx interpreter)? [Obviously, the RexxEngine is found and its call() Method is used, so that part would be o.k.] Please, if you have any insights or hints which may help solve this problem, then please do! (Would there be a way to force apply() to be used instead of call(), which would supply the source? Or, could one indicate that the object-argument supplied to call() which is set to null should possess the sourcecode?) --- Should you need an example (XSLT defining the extension embedding the Rexx code etc. and a short XML-file to be processed, URL to the Rexx-support for BSF), then please let me know. Thanks in advance, ---rony --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
