On Monday, September 9, 2002, at 05:41 AM, Sylvain Wallez wrote: > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: > > <large-snip/> > >> I know it would be easier *right now* to name it 'controller' and >> forget >> about all the above, but I ask you to think in 5 years from now, then >> place your vote. >> >> I vote for <map:flow>. >> > > Lots of good arguments, the main one being that continuations have a > broader usage range than simply the controller part of MVC. And we can > still market <map:flow> as the MVC controller as long it is a > buzzword. > > So I will abstain on <map:controller> against <map:flow> > > However, +1 for <map:call> with attributes "resource", "continuation" > or "function".
Good, I'm glad we all agree. I'll go ahead and implement <map:flow> as declaration and <map:call> with its respective attributes. I like <map:call> because is a very simple verb, with a well understood meaning. I'll update later on what is the status and what still remains to be done. Greetings, -- Ovidiu Predescu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://webweavertech.com/ovidiu/weblog/ (Weblog) http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Monitor/7464/ (Apache, GNU, Emacs ...) --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
