> From: Ugo Cei [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Piroumian Konstantin wrote: > > > Result could seem amazing, knowing how popular is Struts. > But after a > > moment I've realized that so few searches can also indicate more > > visibility of the project (I mean that Struts does not need to be > > searched, cause it's well known). So returning to the > Cocoon vs. Zope > > case, if Cocoon is searched less than Zope this can mean also that > > Cocoon is easier to find by other means (e.g. directly from Apache > > site). > > > > Konstantin > > First of all, as I've already mentioned in another message, this does > not measure search frequency, but just the number of hits.
Ok. > > Second, if you look at the first page of results, you can see > that for > "struts", 8 links out of 10 actually refer to JAKARTA Struts, whereas > for "cocoon", only 2 links out of 10 actually refer to APACHE Cocoon. ;) > > So, what's that you're arguing about? About something that does not > measure what you think it measures ;-). I just wanted to express the same thing as you did: these numbers doesn't show actual interest. But maybe I wasn't so clear. > > By the way, "apache cocoon" beats "jakarta struts" 85,100 to > 29,100. On the other hand, Amazon has 6 books about Struts (1 > available) and 3 > about Cocoon (1 available). I will tell you why. Struts is much simpler than Cocoon and it doesn't need more than 1 book to understand everything (joking, of course). ;) Really, where there is so few books about Struts? Konstantin > > Ugo > > -- > Ugo Cei - http://www.beblogging.com/blog/ > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
