Torsten Curdt wrote:
> ...well, could you really think of more? If I look into our sitemaps those are
> the most widely used ones. All other would be regexpr / wildcard.
>
> I don't think it's that bad... If I can really save that amount of per-request
> processing time - I would go for it!
I wouldn't recommend to do this because:
> We could also modify the WildcardMatcher and hardcode some patterns instead...
This is indeed the way to go: automatically recognize patterns instead of
bothering the user to do it manually.
I'd go even farther and try to build a DFA for
<map:match pattern="foodir/**html">
...
</map:match>
<map:match pattern="bardir/**html">
...
</map:match>
the same way lexers do. In the example above, you can decide where to go
after examining *one* character...
J.Pietschmann
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
