> From: David Crossley [mailto:crossley@;indexgeo.com.au] > > Colin Paul Adams wrote: > <snip/> > > > Can't we decide which format we want to use? > > > I would vote for anything other than DTD (as it is impossible to > > > validate all possible sitemaps with a DTD - ...
Before deciding which schema to use for validation, I just want to tell, that my main intention for choosing WXS was to allow editing and validation of sitemaps in an editor like XML Spy. XML Spy supports validation through DTD and W3C Schema (and probably also DCD, XML-Data, BizTalk Schema are also supported). But it does not support RelaxNG. Konstantin > > > > Yes, as we discussed a few days ago, this decision > > is the next step. To help decide which technology, we > > also need to consider how and when it will be used. > > I presume that we are only talking about build-time > > for now (on sitemap change time is a future issue). > > > > Something that applies a schema via external reference > > is probably key. > > > > I have experimented further with Relax NG today. > > The sitemap-v04.dtd converted into RNG okay when using > DTDinst. There > > is a supplied Ant task for Jing which i am currently trying to get > > happening with Cocoon build.xml (having trouble finding the > JingTask > > class). http://www.thaiopensource.com/relaxng/ > > As Jeff said in another thread, JARV is probably the > > framework that is needed. Jing can work with that. > > This works beautifully. If anyone else wants to try it, > then i have added an "enhancement" patch to Bugzilla > showing the few steps and providing a patch to build.xml > http://nagoya.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=13925 > wo > --David > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
