Steven Punte wrote:
> Cocoon is excellent software, but the broader potential user
> community is in need of more hand-holding (i.e. they are not up for
> the more technical reverse engineering and research task compared to
> our present user community group).
+1 - it's the challenge ahead of us for the year to come.
Other than that, I believe this thread is rapidly approaching the
FUD-level we are now encountering in the flawed J2EE vs .Net benchmark
by the Middleware Company.
Better docs & better design patterns will help us out. As far as
community-based system design and architecture is concerned, I believe
cocoon-dev is doing an ace job, for Cocoon-core at least. But maybe we
should make the distinction between the core and the add-on apps a bit
more clear, so that people don't think they have to use each and every
nifty little feature we added to the codebase to solve our private
itches. A number of competing and overlapping components and
'subframeworks' are perhaps confusing the user community.
</Steven>
--
Steven Noels http://outerthought.org/
Outerthought - Open Source, Java & XML Competence Support Center
[EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- [OT] cocoon is like windows Argyn . Kuketayev
- RE: [OT] cocoon is like windows John Morrison
- Re: [OT] cocoon is like windows Steven Punte
- Re: [OT] cocoon is like windows Steven Noels
- Re: [OT] cocoon is like windows Stefano Mazzocchi
- RE: [OT] cocoon is like windows Hunsberger, Peter
- RE: [OT] cocoon is like windows Argyn . Kuketayev
- Re: [OT] cocoon is like windows Sylvain Wallez
- Re: [OT] cocoon is like windows Stefano Mazzocchi