On Fri, 15 Nov 2002, MikhailFedotov wrote: > Hi! > > > That would youi say about xslt benchmarks on http://www.sarvega.com/ ? > > > xsltc is rated even worse then xalanj itself... > > Still no reply. Comments anyone ? I wonder that was the cause of > such perfomance of xsltc in those tests - tests themselves, or > particular > misfeatures of xsltc triggered by those tests ?
I do wonder if the tests are dubious. For example the libxml2 tests show it to be really slow, but other tests (e.g. xsltmark) show it to be about as fast as MSXML (slower in some areas, faster in others). -- <!-- Matt --> <:->Get a smart net</:-> --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
