Re: Changes made to flow system.js

[Ovidiu Predescu]

On Wednesday, Dec 4, 2002, at 13:11 US/Pacific, Jason Foster wrote:

<snip/>

How about thinking in terms of synchronous and asynchronous I/O?

sendPageAndBlock() or sendPageSync()
sendPageAsync()

On Wednesday, Dec 4, 2002, at 14:33 US/Pacific, Andy Lewis wrote:

what about I/O terms?

sendPageBlocking
sendPageNonBlocking

or something akin to these?

I think the danger is to have the semantics of these functions associated with the way the response page is actually sent over the wire.

To reiterate my option, I think sendPageAndWait and sendPageAndContinue are still the best options. They also provide the maximum compatibility with the old naming, only sendPage dissapears, everything else is the same.

Regards,
Ovidiu


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]