Niclas Hedhman wrote:
People, use some logic here...
The fact that a 50% quorum is required, and the vote will automatically fail if a qurom is not reached, it is better for the "opposition" not to vote at all, than vote -1. There are almost always someone "lazy"/"vacation"/"sick" that is unable to vote, which then is a indirect vote against, if the "opposition" refrains from voting.
Clear?
In Avalon, where the voting procedures came from, there was a larger problem than apathy. Those issues have to a large part been resolved, and I will not dig them up here.
Suffice it to say: The Cocoon PMC members who have volunteered for the job, are responsible to respond to PMC votes. It is also *very* important to have a concept where we are not sneaky. We say what we mean, and we mean what we say. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
