Leo Sutic wrote:
+1 for the treeprocessor as default for 2.0.5From: Carsten Ziegeler [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Is anyone against making the treeprocessor the default engine for 2.0.5?
Is anyone against removing the stylesheet engine? I don't think that we have to keep it for compatibility issues.
But maybe we should keep the compiled one some longer and log a big warning that it is going to be removed? Something like a grace period?
--
Torsten
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]