Bertrand Delacretaz wrote:
Le Lundi, 17 fév 2003, à 14:41 Europe/Zurich, Sylvain Wallez a écrit :...
So what about closing cocoon-docs ? This would avoid believing some mysterious entities are writing the docs for us...
I'd give a reluctant +1 to this proposal.
I'd be +1 as well.
Reluctant because I thought a separate docs list would allow more people to help with the docs without having to care about core development issues - but this has not happened, or not much.
Ok
Actually the wiki has taken this role by allowing non-developers to make great contributions to the overall docs effort, so I agree that going back to [doc] subject lines on cocoon-dev makes sense at this point for docs-related stuff.
I agree.
We shouldn't expect miracles from having cocoon-docs or not, but it might help at this point.If there is no documentation team, there should not be a separate CVS nor a separate mail list.
Also, documentation will have to go along with the blocks that contain that code and we'll have to write a wiki that is able to generate xml documentation.
--
Stefano Mazzocchi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Pluralitas non est ponenda sine necessitate [William of Ockham]
--------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
