Vadim Gritsenko wrote:
Pier Fumagalli wrote:

In the current xml-cocoon2 cvs module there are two branches:
cocoon_20_branch and cocoon_2_0_3_branch

Which one is the current branch used for 2.0 (I suspect 2_0_3)...



You suspect correctly.


cocoon_2_0_3_branch is the "real" 2.0 branch.

If we (Well, Pier ;) does the restructuring shouldn't the stable branch also be renamed?? ..to avoid exactly this confusion?!


I mean "cocoon_2_0_3_branch" is not quite the right name, hm?
--
Torsten



Reply via email to