"Carsten Ziegeler" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Stefano Mazzocchi wrote: >>> You don't have a copy of that tar lying around, right? >> >> Unfortunately not :/ >> > So, what does this mean? Is anything serious lost? At least > it still compiles.
Just a little bit of history on those jars, but they're binary anyhow and can be botched out of the old dist tarballs we have archived (retag those, and yada, yada, yada, if we really have to) Pier