On 9/3/03 5:21 am, "Christopher Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>> On 9/3/03 3:42, "Christopher Oliver" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I added the definition of "JavaObject" for two reasons: fist is that IDL
>> already reserves the keyword "Object" (if you run rmic -idl it'll come out
>> as java.lang._Object), second is because what I want to outline is that what
>> we're passing as a parameter is _actually_ something that really extends a
>> Java Object, and not something that is redefined in another language...
>
>
> OK. I see your point. That makes sense.
Pleased to hear that! :-)
Pier
