On Thu, Mar 13, 2003 at 01:35:41PM +0100, Nicola Ken Barozzi wrote:
>
> Marcus Crafter wrote, On 13/03/2003 12.12:
> ...
> > BTW - I was just about to email you a question regarding
> > CocoonComponentManager.
> >
> > The current version extends from ECM, which hardcodes us to
> > that container implementation - do you think it's possible to find
> > another way so we can alleviate this restriction (making it easier to
> > move between containers when the time comes) ?
> >
> > Any thoughts ?
>
> I thought the same thing recently. You see, I would like to see Fortress
> used now. CocoonComponentManager should use other containers instead of
> extending them, no? It would be quite easy to do it seems.
Yes, I'd like to do some container experimentation too - hence the
thought of reducing some of these dependancies.
Cheers,
Marcus
--
.....
,,$$$$$$$$$, Marcus Crafter
;$' '$$$$: Computer Systems Engineer
$: $$$$: ManageSoft GmbH
$ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
;$, _/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany
' /( &&&
\_&&&&'
&&&&.
&&&&&&&:
