On 18/3/03 23:03, "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Pier Fumagalli wrote:
>> On 18/3/03 21:00, "Stefano Mazzocchi" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>>> I assume, but I'm not sure, that [xx are native internal objects, so
>>> there is not much we can do about those. Still, I would like to know
>>> what is that [10 object that accounts for so much memory.
>>
>>
>> They should be (might be) arrays... As that's the way in which you define
>> them in JNI (roughly).... And the number after that _should_ (but I ain't
>> sure) the type of array that you're actually looking at. Should be one of:
>>
>> #define JVMPI_NORMAL_OBJECT ((jint)0)
>> #define JVMPI_CLASS ((jint)2)
>> #define JVMPI_BOOLEAN ((jint)4)
>> #define JVMPI_CHAR ((jint)5)
>> #define JVMPI_FLOAT ((jint)6)
>> #define JVMPI_DOUBLE ((jint)7)
>> #define JVMPI_BYTE ((jint)8)
>> #define JVMPI_SHORT ((jint)9)
>> #define JVMPI_INT ((jint)10)
>> #define JVMPI_LONG ((jint)11)
>>
>> You never _never_ have access to the JVM internal objects from any
>> whatsoever possible pre-defined interface... And I tried... :-)
>
> Ah, gotcha.
>
> So, the question becomes: what allocates 500Kb of int arrays?
Hmmm... I overlooked the fact that there was also a "[C", which to me
strikes as a hex digit... So, you can also read that [10 as hex, which makes
16... So, I don't think it's an "int" array... It's a something-else
array...
IIRC, Scott Boag once told me that the DTM (the internal pseudo dom used by
Xalan) is only a big huge array... Could that be the case?
Pier
