On 24/3/03 7:38 pm, "Steven Noels" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (follow up to cocoon-docs please)
>
> On 24/03/2003 7:31 Steven Noels wrote:
>
>> In order to get one little step closer to the 'new' document
>> infrastructure, many of us seek clarity whether we should move docs to a
>> separate CVS module or not. The benefits and downfalls are largely
>> known, so let's vote on this and get this issue cleared.
>>
>> My own personal bias: don't forget the different Cocoon _versions_ are
>> now stored in separate modules, too.
>>
>> Please cast your vote:
>
> results so far:
>
> [ ] creation of cocoon-docs module: morrijr, shannon, stefano,
> bdelacretaz
> not sure because of comments: sylvain
> not sure because of 0.x vote: haul
> not eligible but almost a committer: andrew
>
> [ ] docs should stay in src/documentation of the code tree
> module(s): jefft, nicolaken, pier, stephan
>
> ... which means we could use some more votes do establish genuine
> consensus...!
Steven... I didn't say that the documentation should reside in the
src/documentation... I lean (on the other hand) quite on the other side of
the fence, because I know that if someone wants to have those docs in
src/documentation, we can make this happen easily like the HTTP project does
with its documentation... :-)
Pier
