Stefan Seifert wrote:
>
> No, you misunderstood me. I saved the PDF stream in a file, put it in
> the webapps/<Context>-directory and served it using tomcat via HTTP,
> same context and server as the cocoon output.
> Ever tried this? Try it with your bug sample, it takes just some
> seconds. How do you explain this difference?
Let me try :-)
1) Did you use the same Tomcat on the same machine to serve the saved
file as compared to the generated file? If not, check the security
options in your IE (e.g. settings for Internet vs. settings for
Intranet)
2) Did you call the saved file "myfile.xml" or did you call it
"myfile.pdf"? If the latter, then do the former.
3) Did you set a MIME-Type of "application/pdf" for the saved file? If
no, then do it.
> Then you will sit as an idealist on your island... but ok, your opinion
> makes sense from you point of view.
I don't understand you. On one hand you're happy to use a great
OpenSource software for free, on the other hand you are actively helping
MS undermine the OpenSource movement. You're shooting yourself in your
own foot down the line. One day everyone will use IE and no-one will be
able to deploy Cocoon anymore, because IE contains code that
intentionally searches for competing server software like Cocoon and
refuses to work with it.
Ulrich
--
Ulrich Mayring
DENIC eG, Systementwicklung
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
