Hello Liam

I'm using Cocoon2. I don't see where your logicsheet (XSL) is ?

It's like the greeting3 sample from the Cocoon2 homepage.

Cheers

Beat

Hello Lia,
>From: "Liam MacQuarrie Morley" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Subject: Re: Separation of Logic and Content
>Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2001 18:09:02 -0400
>
>It would be nice if you were to mention whether you are using Cocoon 1 or
>Cocoon 2, as I'm not sure if there are differences. The following is what I
>do for Cocoon 2 to seperate the XSL from the XML in the stylesheet (which is
>fairly common in the examples):
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>As you can see, the generate src specifies the XML, and the transform type
>specifies the XSL, both in the stylesheet.
>
>Liam Morley
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: Beat De Martin
>To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Wednesday, August 29, 2001 2:14 PM
>Subject: Separation of Logic and Content
>
>
>
>Hello
>If I want to separate logic (XSL) and content (XML) how will the sitemap
>look like ?
>I know I could handle the logicsheet like a taglib and make a new entry in
>the cocoon.xconf. Is there another way ?
>Thanks
>Beat
>
>
>
>
>
>Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
>--------------------------------------------------------------------- Please
>check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before
>posting. To unsubscribe, e-mail: For additional commands, e-mail:
>
>
>---------------------------------------------------------------------
>Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
>FAQ before posting.
>
>To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>


Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
--------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to