One of the items I just read in the release notes for
Tomcat 4.02 beta 1 . . . . . .

For optimum performance with Tomcat 4 and Cocoon 2,
use the HTTP/1.0 connector.

/mde/
--- Michael Homeijer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> If you add a timing for pure XSP (without XSLT), you
> will know where to tune
> (XSP or XSLT). Maybe you can report this back also.
> 
> In the original mail in the following URL there's
> something you can try:
> 
>
http://www2.real-time.com/pipermail/cocoon-devel/2001-August/010394.html
> 
> (try to get the generated source code of one of your
> XSP, compile it
> as a generator and use it as a normal generator
> instead. [this should
> remove the XSP loading/handling phase])
> 
> Let us know the result.
> 
> HTH,
> Michael Homeijer
> 
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 21-12-2001 9:00 
> Subject: cocoon2 performance
> 
> Hello
> [snip]
> 
> Here are the performance results for 500 sequential
> requests (wget):
> 
> normal JSP: 6 seconds
> XSP/XSLT: 22 seconds
> JSP/XSLT: 133 seconds!!
> 
> [snip]
> 
> 2. is there a way to make XSP even faster
> (performance tuning)?
> 
> [snip]
> 
> best regards
> - Rainer
> 
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
> Please check that your question has not already been
> answered in the
> FAQ before posting.
> <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>
> 
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail:
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> 


__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Check out Yahoo! Shopping and Yahoo! Auctions for all of
your unique holiday gifts! Buy at http://shopping.yahoo.com
or bid at http://auctions.yahoo.com

---------------------------------------------------------------------
Please check that your question has not already been answered in the
FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html>

To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to