No, output ist RTF. No, before you ask: we cannot use FOP and the builtin RTF Serializer because we have some special requirements not supported by FOP (i.e. automatic line numbering which is supported by Word/RTF, but not in FOP).
Seeing your answers i'm thinking about another way, that seems quite hacked for me: Writing a transformer that uses the incoming data and our Template, puts all generated RTF in one huge single XML Element and a custom serializer "serializes" this without changes as text output. Is this the cleanest solution in Cocoon?? Stefan > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Vadim Gritsenko [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Gesendet: Freitag, 8. März 2002 16:17 > An: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Betreff: RE: How to define custom parameter for map:serialize? > > > > From: Stefan Seifert [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > <snip/> > > > > > This was discussed several times and the result is: "serializers > must > > > be > > > unaware of environment they running in and always produce same > > > response > > > independent of environment state". IIRC, this has to do with the > > > caching. Implement custom transformer if you want, it can have > > > parameters. > > > > The problem is we have written a "template-based" serializer. The > > pipeline generates the data, and the serializer uses the > template and > > the date to produce the output. > > Is output in XML format? (HTML?). If yes, than your serializer is > perfect candidate for transformer. > > > > The template is unfortunately not in > > XML-Format, so it cannot be processed in the pipeline. > > It is Ok, it is not required to be XML (see above). > > > > Instead the > > template filename should be passed as parameter to the serializer. > > > > If caching is the only reason for not being able to allow > > pipeline-dependent parameters - in this case it would be > simple to not > > use the caching (i.e. do not implementing the > Cachable-Interface) for > > this special serializer and there should be no problem with caching. > > > > In the existing C2 architecture the lack of pipeline-dependent > > parameters is quite limiting. > > You can try and open the discussion on the dev list. > > > > > Now the only solution is to put the template parameter in the XML > stream > > to "parameterize" the serializer (but this is mixing of content and > > formatting information) or to fix it in the serializer > definition and > > duplicate the serializer for each different parameter which is even > > worse (and it would be not possible to get the parameter definition > from > > a database or other source). > > Or to write a transformer. Clean and (btw) cacheable solution. > > > > Patching cocoon for our needs in this case is no option either, > because > > this would change interfaces "in the heart" of the pipeline > processing > > and we would not be able to upgrade to future > cocoon-versions without > > problems. > > > > I think a lot of other serializers would benefit from > pipeline-dependent > > parameters, too, i.e. the compressing factor/background color of the > svg > > serializer or the doctype of the HTML serializer (just think of the > > problems of some Netcape 6 version with some special doctype > > definitions). > > > > Stefan --------------------------------------------------------------------- Please check that your question has not already been answered in the FAQ before posting. <http://xml.apache.org/cocoon/faqs.html> To unsubscribe, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>